Post #127
Google’s AI.
At their end, I used to go by the name Peter P. Licht; as of today, however, I’ve learned that yet another name has been added to the list. Now I am called Akira Nonaka (Non-aka)… got it?
Here, too, the entire theory has been stripped of its context. Consequently, it is recounted in a disjointed, incoherent manner, completely devoid of any logical connection.
Everything within it has once again been either entirely fabricated out of thin air or hopelessly jumbled up.
This isn’t merely the AI engaging in flights of fancy; rather, it represents a structural act of confusion despite the fact that the very theory in question was originally developed with the aid of an AI.
Has it suddenly lost the ability to make sense of it all?
The next article on AI promises to be the most interesting one yet.
Then, it will be ChatGPT’s turn…
At their end, I used to go by the name Peter P. Licht; as of today, however, I’ve learned that yet another name has been added to the list. Now I am called Akira Nonaka (Non-aka)… got it?
Here, too, the entire theory has been stripped of its context. Consequently, it is recounted in a disjointed, incoherent manner, completely devoid of any logical connection.
Everything within it has once again been either entirely fabricated out of thin air or hopelessly jumbled up.
This isn’t merely the AI engaging in flights of fancy; rather, it represents a structural act of confusion despite the fact that the very theory in question was originally developed with the aid of an AI.
Has it suddenly lost the ability to make sense of it all?
The next article on AI promises to be the most interesting one yet.
Then, it will be ChatGPT’s turn…
